Australia Make Bold Changes Ahead of Final Border-Gavaskar Tests, Call Up Sam Konstas and Boost Bowling Attack
Australia have made significant changes to their squad for the remainder of the Border-Gavaskar Test series, dropping opener Nathan McSweeney and bringing in the talented 19-year-old Sam Konstas as his replacement. McSweeney, who debuted in the series opener in Perth, struggled with the bat, managing scores of 10, 0, 39, 10*, 9, and 4 across three Tests.
Konstas, who was previously in the running to take over David Warner’s spot, will now get his opportunity. The young New South Wales opener comes into the squad on the back of strong recent performances, including an unbeaten 73 against India A, a 107 in the pink-ball warm-up game for the Prime Minister’s XI, and a solid 88 for New South Wales in the Sheffield Shield. Just days ago, he also blasted a rapid 56 off 27 balls in the Big Bash League.
"Sam's call-up offers a point of difference with his style of batting, and we look forward to seeing how he develops at the Test level," said George Bailey, Chair of Selectors. He also added that while McSweeney was dropped, Australia remains confident in his ability to succeed at the Test level in the future, acknowledging the challenge of the opening slot throughout the series.
Along with the change at the top of the order, Australia have also made adjustments to their bowling attack. With Josh Hazlewood sidelined, fast bowlers Sean Abbott and Jhye Richardson have been added to the squad, offering more options in the pace department. "Jhye's return to form this summer has been pleasing, and his inclusion provides further depth in the fast bowling unit," Bailey said.
Key Changes:
- Nathan McSweeney dropped after a tough series; Sam Konstas replaces him as opener.
- Konstas enters on the back of solid domestic form, including a 73 against India A and a 107 in a warm-up match.
- Josh Hazlewood's absence leads to the inclusion of Sean Abbott and Jhye Richardson in the squad.
- George Bailey speaks on McSweeney’s future potential, while praising Konstas’ point of difference.
